SHANGHAI, May 27, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- On May 20, 2026, Viva Biotech hosted a V-Experts in Conversation webinar, "Managing Complexity in Modern Drug Discovery: A Practical Approach to Integrated Screening & Chemistry." Moderated by Victoria Ouroutzoglou, Associate Director of Business Development at Viva Biotech, the roundtable featured Dr. Bing Xia, Vice President & Head of Early Discovery Platforms, and Dr. Tim Dwight, Senior Director of Medicinal Chemistry & Business Development. The discussion examined how integrated screening workflows with medicinal chemistry embeds greater scientific discipline to early drug discovery, streamlining the clearer decisions as programs advance from hit identification to lead optimization.

Hit Identification Starts with Target Context

As Dr. Bing Xia emphasized, hit identification is highly target-dependent and is not best approached as a fixed route. Strategy selection should begin with the target context, including biological validation, tractability, assay readiness, structural information, protein availability, resource constraints, and the broader IP and competitive landscape.

When high-quality structural information is available, fragment-based drug discovery or virtual screening may provide efficient entry points. When a reliable functional or cellular assay has been established, HTS remains a powerful route for assessing biological activity across large compound collections. For more challenging targets, affinity-based approaches such as DEL, ASMS, or SPR can help address early questions around druggability, particularly when protein availability or assay readiness is limited.

The discussion also highlighted V-DEL-facilitated target triage as one of Viva Biotech's practical approaches for early target and modality assessment. By integrating DEL screening outcomes, protein science expertise, protein QC and conformational-state assessment, and an AI-powered V-DEL Friendly Index, this approach can help assess ligandability, rank targets or constructs, prioritize resources, and inform whether small molecules or linear/cyclic peptides may represent suitable modality directions. This can be especially valuable for first-in-class or less-characterized targets, where early data helps reduce uncertainty and guide resource allocation.

Validated Hits Require More Than Primary Activity

Primary screening readouts are only the starting point. To advance a hit with confidence, teams need a layered validation workflow that combines purity and liability checks, dose-response confirmation, orthogonal assays, selectivity and counter-screening, cytotoxicity assessment, and biophysical binding studies. This process helps distinguish actionable hits from false positives, nonspecific binders, and assay artifacts.

Dr. Xia also discussed Viva Biotech's continuously updated "promiscuous frequent hits" dataset with masked target names. Built from accumulated screening experience, this internal resource supports more informed triage and helps reduce the risk of advancing misleading hits across screening campaigns.

DMTA Cycles Require Clear Hypotheses

After hit validation, the design–make–test–analyze cycle becomes a central operating framework for advancing compounds. From the medicinal chemistry perspective, Dr. Tim Dwight emphasized the importance of close coordination across medicinal chemistry, AIDD/CADD, biology, DMPK, and project teams. These cycles often operate on a weekly cadence, to align with primary assay workflows, allowing teams to generate new hypotheses, refine and select new designs, and prioritize focused compound sets.

Structure-based design, ligand-centric SAR analysis, molecular descriptors, FEP, MD simulations, ADMET prediction, and AI/ML-supported modeling can all contribute to compound prioritization. The objective is not to generate designs in isolation, but to test defined hypotheses and determine which directions should continue, pause, or be replaced.

Dr. Dwight also noted that the scale of chemical change often evolves with the stage of the program. In hit-to-lead, larger scaffold or functional-group changes may be needed to remove liabilities, test tractability, and build backup series. As programs move into lead optimization, smaller SAR-driven changes often become more important for improving potency, selectivity, exposure, safety, and developability.

Integration Supports Scientific Discipline

Clear go/no-go criteria are essential to prevent programs from continuing without sufficient evidence of tractability, efficacy, or developability. Assay enablement, protein construct quality, target modulation, in vivo efficacy, therapeutic index, scaffold-specific toxicity, DDI risk, cross-species PK, early CMC considerations, and nomination criteria can all influence program decisions.

In this context, integration is less about placing multiple capabilities under one roof, and more about connecting the right data, expertise, and decision points at each stage of discovery. By integrating protein science, structural biology, screening, medicinal chemistry, AIDD/CADD, biology, and DMPK, Viva Biotech supports a continuous discovery workflow, helping partners move from target understanding to validated hits and lead optimization with greater rigor, efficiency and scientific discipline.

Logo - https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2934554/Viva_Logo.jpg

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/from-hit-identification-to-lead-optimization-building-scientific-continuity-in-early-drug-discovery-302783072.html

Der deutsche Aktienmarkt ist nach dem verlängerten Wochenende mit leichten Gewinnen in den Mai gestartet. Der Dax notierte wenige Minuten nach Xetra-Eröffnung am Montag 0,14 Prozent höher bei 24.328 Punkten und knüpfte damit an die kräftige Erholung vom vergangenen Donnerstag an. Bereits der vorbörsliche X-Dax hatte auf einen freundlichen Start hingedeutet und lag rund eine Stunde vor Handelsbeginn 0,35 Prozent im Plus bei 24.377 Punkten.

Am letzten Handelstag vor dem Feiertag hatte der Leitindex mit einer deutlichen intraday-Trendwende das angeschlagene Chartbild aufgehellt. Nach einem Start am Tagestief von 23.715 Punkten gewann der Dax im Verlauf fast zweieinhalb Prozent und schloss auf Tageshoch. Der MDax der mittelgroßen Werte setzte die Erholung am Montag mit einem Plus von 0,77 Prozent auf 30.826 Zähler dynamischer fort, während der Eurozonen-Leitindex EuroStoxx 50 leicht im Minus lag.

Die Stimmung bleibt dennoch fragil. Marktteilnehmer beobachten weiter die Entwicklung im Nahost-Krieg, die Ölpreisentwicklung und insbesondere die Lage rund um die Straße von Hormus. Die Situation habe sich über das Wochenende „nicht wesentlich verbessert, aber auch nicht wesentlich verschlechtert“, sagte Andreas Lipkow von CMC Markets. Die Nachrichtenlage sei nach wie vor undurchsichtig, was die Risikobereitschaft der Investoren bremse.

Zusätzlichen Druck erhält der Markt von der Handelspolitik der USA. US-Präsident Donald Trump kündigte auf seiner Plattform Truth Social eine deutliche Anhebung der US-Zölle auf Fahrzeuge aus der EU an und zielte dabei besonders auf Europa und Deutschland. Die EU-Kommission behält sich Gegenmaßnahmen vor, sollte Washington die Pläne umsetzen. An die Rhetorik Trumps haben sich Anleger indes ein Stück weit gewöhnt: Laut Jens Klatt vom Broker XTB waren frühere Zolldrohungen häufig Teil der Verhandlungsmasse oder wurden im Zeitverlauf angepasst. Er hält auch diesmal rasche bilaterale Gespräche zwischen den USA, der EU und deutschen Herstellern für wahrscheinlich.

Ungeachtet dieser Einordnung standen Autoaktien zum Wochenauftakt unter Druck. BMW, Mercedes-Benz und Volkswagen wurden im vorbörslichen Handel auf Tradegate unter ihren Xetra-Schlusskursen vom vergangenen Donnerstag gesehen und galten auch im Dax als Belastungsfaktor. Die Kombination aus geopolitischen Risiken, unsicherer Handelspolitik und sektorbezogenen Zolldrohungen dürfte den Sektor vorerst volatil halten, selbst wenn der Gesamtmarkt zum Start in den Mai einen überwiegend freundlichen Ton anschlägt.